Docs / AI Agent Control Plane

AI Agent Control Plane Implementation Guide

Use these docs to evaluate architecture, registry fields, policy models, audit logs, integrations, security controls, compliance mapping, and deployment options for an agentic IAM PoC.

Public documentation boundary

These examples are intentionally product-level and non-operational. They describe control concepts for evaluation, not Rutile internal rule order, production endpoints, credentials, tenant topology, detection thresholds, bypass conditions, or customer data.

No secrets or live endpoints
No customer-specific topology
No exploitable rule logic

Quickstart PoC path01

A Rutile PoC should prove four flows: register agents, route tool calls, broker temporary access, and produce audit evidence.

  • Select one high-value agent workflow.
  • Register the agent owner, tools, data scopes, and risk tier.
  • Route MCP/API calls through Rutile policy evaluation.
  • Review audit events with the security team.
rutile-poc.yaml
agent:
  id: sample-procurement-agent
  owner: security-platform-team
  purpose: approved supplier risk review
  tools: [approved_crm.read, vendor_risk.query]
policy:
  default: deny
  allow_when: owner_verified && change_ticket_approved
  max_duration: 15m

Core concepts02

Rutile models an AI agent as a governed non-human identity with owner, purpose, authority, tool scope, risk tier, and lifecycle state.

ConceptPurpose
Agent IdentityUnique ID, owner, runtime, model, purpose, and expiration.
Delegation ChainHuman intent mapped to agent action, model reasoning, tool call, and resource access.
JIT/JEA AccessTemporary permission sized to the task and revoked after use.
Runtime EnforcementAllow, deny, mask, request approval, rate limit, quarantine, revoke, or terminate.

Architecture overview03

Rutile is positioned between agent runtimes and enterprise tools so policy is evaluated before execution, not only after logging.

  • Connect identity providers for owner and group context.
  • Route LLM, MCP, A2A, SaaS, database, and cloud calls through the policy proxy.
  • Stream decisions and outcomes to audit, SIEM, and reporting pipelines.

Agent registry data model04

The registry gives security teams a searchable inventory of every agent that can act on enterprise systems.

FieldDescription
agent_idStable agent identifier.
ownerHuman or team accountable for the agent.
purposeApproved business purpose and usage boundary.
toolsMCP, API, SaaS, database, file, and cloud tools the agent may call.
risk_tierBusiness and data sensitivity level.
expires_atDate when the agent must be reviewed or retired.

Policy model05

Policies combine identity, intent, tool, resource, data sensitivity, approval state, time, and runtime risk.

policy.json
{
  "effect": "allow_with_jit",
  "when": {
    "agent.risk_tier": "medium",
    "tool": "vendor_risk.query",
    "data_scope": "approved_supplier_records",
    "approval": "change_ticket_approved"
  },
  "grant": { "duration": "15m", "access": "read_only" }
}

Integration guide06

Rutile is designed to coexist with IAM, PAM, SIEM, DLP, LLM gateways, MCP servers, A2A agents, and internal platform tooling.

  • Use existing IAM as the source of truth for people, groups, and owners.
  • Keep existing SIEM as the investigation surface while Rutile supplies agent-native events.
  • Use Rutile policy proxy for enforcement on agent tool execution paths.

Audit log specification07

Audit events must explain who delegated work, what agent acted, what tool was used, what access was granted, and what happened.

Audit fieldExample
requester_idapproved_user
agent_idsample-procurement-agent
modelapproved-enterprise-model
toolvendor_risk.query
resourceapproved_supplier_records
policy_decisionallow_with_jit
risk_score42
session_idrt-session-example

Security model08

Rutile aligns with zero-trust principles: never trust an agent by default, always verify identity and context, and continuously monitor execution.

  • Default deny for unknown agents and unknown tools.
  • Short-lived credentials and explicit scopes for approved tasks.
  • Policy enforcement before tool execution and runtime response after suspicious behavior.
  • Human approval for high-risk actions and sensitive data scopes.

Compliance mapping09

Rutile evidence can support AI governance and security review programs by mapping agent controls to recognized frameworks.

FrameworkRutile evidence
OWASP LLM / Agentic AIPrompt, tool, excessive agency, and audit control mapping.
OWASP MCP Top 10Token control, scope enforcement, tool poisoning, authz, telemetry, and shadow MCP visibility.
NIST AI RMFGovern, map, measure, and manage evidence for agentic AI risk.
ISO/IEC 42001AI management system evidence for policy, operation, monitoring, and continual improvement.

Deployment options10

Deployment should match data sensitivity, regulatory requirements, and network architecture.

ModelBest fit
SaaSFast evaluation and lightweight PoC.
Private CloudCustomer VPC or dedicated environment for sensitive organizations.
On-Prem / HybridInternal networks, regulated industries, and data sovereignty requirements.

Start with Agent Registry and Policy Proxy.

A focused PoC can validate agent inventory, MCP/API proxy enforcement, JIT permission grants, and audit logs before a broader rollout.

Next / PoC

Start with Agent Registry and Policy Proxy.

A focused PoC can validate agent inventory, MCP/API proxy enforcement, JIT permission grants, and audit logs before a broader rollout.